IKAL ANGELEI Goldman Environmental Prize winners

David vs. Goliath: Goldman Environmental Prize winners highlight development projects gone awry
Jeremy Hance
April 16, 2012

Right of left: Evgenia Chirikova, Edwin Gariguez, Ma Jun, Ikal Angelei, Caroline Cannon, and Sofia Gatica. Photo courtesy of Goldman Environmental Prize.
Right of left: Evgenia Chirikova, Edwin Gariguez, Ma Jun, Ikal Angelei, Caroline Cannon, and Sofia Gatica. Photo courtesy of Goldman Environmental Prize.


A controversial dam, a massive mine, poisonous pesticides, a devastating road, and criminal polluters: many of this year’s Goldman Environmental Prize winners point to the dangers of poorly-planned, and ultimately destructive, development initiatives. The annual prize, which has been dubbed the Green Nobel Prize is awarded to six grassroots environmental heroes from around the world and includes a financial award of $150,000 for each winner.

Water Warrior

In northern Kenya, Ikal Angelei has been fighting the massive Ethiopian dam, Gibe III, that would plunder Lake Turkana of its water.

“The dam is expected to cause the lake’s water level to drop by as much as 23 to 33 feet within the first five years, depleting fish stocks and depriving communities of a critical source of potable water in this desert environment. Poverty and resource conflicts between communities are likely to increase as a result,” according to a statement on the Goldman Environmental Prize website.

If built the dam would be the largest in Africa and the fourth largest in the world, but Angelei has worked hard to stop it by bringing together the often factious local tribes living around Lake Turkana to put pressure on the Kenyan government as well as the banks financing the project. Today the fate of the dam remains undecided, but even this is largely due to Angelei’s efforts in making the communities’ voices heard.

“The Gibe 3, like many destructive dams, is going to wipe out a way of life of a people, a people whose concerns transcend country and cultural boundaries,” Angelei said in an interview with Goldman Environmental Prize. “When I started reading about the extent of damage and the number of people who would be affected I started to think, does development really have to have this impact on people?”

People or profits?

On the Philippine island of Mindoro, Catholic priest Edwin Gariguez is leading a modern crusade against a proposed nickel mine that could harm the forest’s unique biodiversity, contaminate the island’s rivers, and has already sullied indigenous peoples’ sacred ancestral ground.

Owned by Norwegian company Intex, the $2.4 billion mine was pushed through the Philippine government despite large-scale local opposition.

In response Gariguez, known as ‘Father Edu’, created a powerful coalition against the mine, led protests in the face of violence, lost a colleague who was murdered for their activism, and spent 11 days on a hunger strike until the government of the Philippines revoked the mining permit.

“For the indigenous Mangyan people living on Mindoro Island, the struggle to protect our threatened ecology is a matter of survival,” Father Edu said in a press release. “We should not sacrifice people and the environment for the sake of short term profits by a few.”

Pesticide tragedy

After losing her daughter three days after birth to inexplicable kidney failure, Sofia Gatica organized local mothers to investigate door-to-door the impact of pesticides on her Argentinean community.

“Residents reported cancer rates that were 41 times the national average (doctors suspect that many other cases go unreported), as well as high rates of neurological and respiratory diseases, birth defects, and infant mortality,” notes the Goldman Environmental Prize website. Future scientific research confirmed these findings and linked them to the use of pesticides on nearby soy fields.

Gatica and her organization, Stop Spraying, have succeeded in new regulations on pesticide use and a national ban on a particularly potent agricultural, endosulfan. They are now pushing for a national ban on glyphosate, the main ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup.

“Ultimately, we want to hold the government and the responsible companies accountable for the harm they are doing,” Gatica told the Goldman Environmental Prize in an interview. “These companies have been poisoning us and are leaving sick communities in their wake. If we cannot get them to stop there is nowhere for us to turn. This is a national health crisis and we want it to be treated as such.”

Transparency in China

China’s economic explosion has come with some dire consequences: toxic air and water issues. But one man has used the Internet to make China’s pollution problems come to life.

Ma Jun’s organization, the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs (IPE), has uncovered and publicly published over 90,000 pollution violations by local and multinational corporations working in China via online maps.

Jun then harnessed public frustration to push many companies to make clean-up their act. Most recently he has won a protracted battle with Apple for the company to take a long and hard look at its supply chain in China.

“Chinese citizens, for the first time in history, have at their fingertips information that reveals which companies are violating environmental regulations across China’s 31 provinces—and with it, the power to demand justice,” notes the Goldman Environmental Prize website.

Jun says that development and environmental stewardship can go together.

“I hope people in China will understand that we are doing this work to help China’s development, not impede it. It is about working together with stakeholders to improve China’s environmental protection. We fully trust that the pollution problem cannot be addressed without extensive public participation.”

Arctic greed

While the U.S. government and oil companies push relentlessly to drill offshore in the extreme conditions of the Arctic, they still face the indomitable Caroline Cannon. A leader of the Inupiat people at Point Hope, Cannon has proven a force to be reckoned with when it comes to preserving her community’s way of life, which depends on the Arctic sea.

In 2009, Point Hope, Cannon’s community of 700, and several green groups won a landmark lawsuit against Shell Oil, which planned to drill in Chukchi Sea. But despite this victory, the war is far from over: the Obama Administration is near making a final decision for Shell to begin drilling in the Chukchi Sea as early as this summer.

Critics and experts warn that an oil spill in the Arctic may prove near-impossible to mitigate, since the region is buffeted by extreme weather, seasonal ice, and an almost total lack of infrastructure.

“The Arctic is like any national park; once a mistake is made it’s nearly impossible to salvage the wildlife and everything around it. Yet, the government does not recognize our land in the same way as a national park,” Cannon said in an interview with the Goldman Environmental Prize, noting that, “As a tribe we do not have the funding and resources that the big corporations do to influence politicians.”

For Cannon, who vows to keep fighting, one oil spill could mean an irrevocable loss of her community’s livelihoods and traditions.

Pave over paradise?

Khimki Forest has become a symbol of political frustration in Russia. Just north of Moscow, the 2,500 acre old-growth forest is a beloved natural respite from the city complete with Russian wildlife . But when mother-of-two Evgenia Chirikova discovered that the Russian government planned to build a road directly through the protected area, she took political action in a country known for crackdowns.

Chirikova began a campaign to save Khimki including a rally of 5,000 and 50,000 signatures, but she faced entrenched corruption and resistance in what was a pet project for many upper officials.

The middle class mother has been arrested several times and officials have threatened to take her children from her. A journalist covering the issue suffered brain damage and lost a leg in a murder attempt. Other journalists have been beaten.

“At first I wanted only to protect the forest, but then I realized that we cannot do this if people in Russia aren’t able to stand up for their beliefs,” Chirikova says in an interview with the Goldman Environmental Prize.

The fight to save the forest, which has not yet been won as trees continue to be felled, has become a rallying point for many who want to see change in Russia.

Read more: http://news.mongabay.com/2012/0416-hance_goldmanprize2012.html#ixzz1sQU8QIVk


Posted on April 18, 2012, in Categorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: